0275 Degree of conversion of adhesives related to different curing times
V.J. MILETIC1, A. SANTINI1, V. IVANOVIC2, and R. IBBETSON1, 1The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, 2University of Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro

Objectives: To calculate the degree of conversion (DC) of five self-etch adhesives light-cured for 5 s, 10 s and 20 s using a high-intensity LED light-curing unit (LCU).

Methods: Ten samples of each of the following adhesives were prepared: AdheSE One (Ivoclar Vivadent), Clearfil 3S bond (Kuraray Medical), G bond (GC Corp), Xeno III (Dentsply DeTrey) and Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE). One drop of adhesive was smeared on a microscopic slide using a disposable applicator. A Mylar strip was placed on top of the adhesive which was then cured using a high intensity LED LCU (Elipar Freelight2, 3M ESPE; 1000 mW/cm2). Micro-Raman spectroscopy was used to determine DC by calculating the ratio of the number of unreacted methacrylate groups pre- and post-curing. The data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test at 95% significance level.

Results: For all curing times, there were significant differences in DC values in each group, except for the Cleafil 3S group (p<0.01). At manufacturers’ recommended time of 10 s, the DC of adhesives showed decreasing order: G bond (76.01%±11.65%) > Clearfil 3S bond (73.54% ±7.53%) > AdheSE One (43.52%±8.44%) > Xeno III (40.65%±8.66%) > Adper Prompt L-Pop (27.71%±9.24%).

Conclusions: Curing time in excess of manufacturers’ recommended time showed higher DC values of all adhesives irrespective of their chemical composition. Dimethacrylate-based adhesives associated with milder acidic functional monomers showed the highest DC values.

Seq #26 - BSDR-DMG Prize / Ceramics
3:30 PM-5:30 PM, Wednesday, September 10, 2008 Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre Theatre L

Back to the PEF IADR 2008 Program
Back to the Pan European Federation of the International Association for Dental Research (September 10-12, 2008)

Top Level Search