| | |
| 1899 | Longevity and Reasons for Replacement of Amalgam Restorations
G. MONCADA1, J. MARTIN1, E. FERNANDEZ1, P. VILDOSOLA1, C. CAAMANO1, V. ARANGUIZ1, M. CARO1, I. MJOR2, and V.V. GORDAN2, 1University of Chile, Santiago, Chile, 2University of Florida, Gainesville, USA |
| 1900 | Longevity and Reasons for Replacement of Resin-based Composite Restorations
G. MONCADA1, J. MARTIN1, E. FERNANDEZ1, P. VILDOSOLA1, C. CAAMANO1, M. CARO1, I.A. MJOR2, and V.V. GORDAN2, 1University of Chile, Santiago, Chile, 2University of Florida, Gainesville, USA |
| 1901 | Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: What comes next?
F.J.T. BURKE, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom, and P.S.K. LUCAROTTI, Dental Practice Board, Eastbourne, United Kingdom |
| 1902 | Clinical Evaluation of Two Light Curing Techniques
K.B. FRAZIER, M.G. BRACKETT, D.C. CHAN, R.M. POHJOLA, and W.D. BROWNING, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, USA |
| 1903 | Four year in vivo performance of a Lithia-disilicate based ceramic
J. ESQUIVEL-UPSHAW1, K.J. ANUSAVICE2, J. JONES2, H. YOUNG2, and M. YANG2, 1University of Texas - San Antonio / Health Science Ctr, USA, 2University of Florida -, Gainesville, USA |
| 1904 | Comparison of reinforced glass ionomer and dual cure resin cement
J. ESQUIVEL-UPSHAW1, K.J. ANUSAVICE2, J. JONES2, H. YOUNG2, and M. YANG2, 1University of Texas - San Antonio / Health Science Ctr, USA, 2University of Florida -, Gainesville, USA |
| 1905 | Clinical performance of FRC compared to titanium endodontic posts
M. NAUMANN1, G. STERZENBACH2, F. BLANKENSTEIN2, and K.-P. LANGE2, 1Humboldt-University Berlin, Charite - University Medicine, Germany, 2Humboldt-University Berlin, Germany |
|