| 1338 Repair & Resurfacing Previously Placed Aged Composite Restorations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
G.B. GREITZER, none, Tarrytown, NY, USA, and J. KANCA, None, Middlebury, CT, USA Objectives: Daily dental practice presents a definitive need for repairing and resurfacing previously placed composite restorations. This study evaluates two adhesives designed for addition of composite material to aged composite Methods: 112 matrices were placed into 1inch methylmethacrylate cylinders and filled with composite. 56 filled with Amazon™ (Medidenta Inc),56 filled with Vit-l-escence™ (Ultradent). Each was light polymerized for 30 Seconds with LED - (Flashlite tm; 1001- Discus Dental). Test samples were ground flat & polished with 320 grit wet-dry emery cloth. Samples were aged in water at 37 degrees C for 2 months prior to testing. Adhesives selected for testing - Add&Bond tm; (Parkell inc) and Simplicity tm; (Apex Dental). Upon removal from water, samples were dried and treated with 50µ Al2O3 spray - 80 PSI, - 5 seconds. Adhesives were applied as instructed and 2.38mm diameter X 1.5mm high composite posts of the same composite as the base were place and polymerized. Test samples were separated into 4 testing categories of 28 samples each. Add&Bond/Amazon; Add&Bond/Vit-l-escence; Simplicity/Amazon; Simplicity/Vit-l-escence. Using a Universal Testing machine notched blade apparatus with a crosshead speed of 1mm per minute, 14 samples of each category were stressed to fracture immediately and 14 of each were fractured following 4 month aging in water at 37 degrees C.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Seq #158 - Composite Repair, Biocompatibility, Adhesive Interfaces 3:00 PM-4:00 PM, Friday, 10 March 2006 Dolphin Hotel Pacific Hall | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Back to the Dental Materials: II - Adhesion-Other Program
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||