1879 Fracture Strength and Marginal Adaptation of All-Ceramic FPDs
M. ROSENTRITT1, M.I. SIKORA2, M. BEHR1, and G. HANDEL1, 1University of Regensburg, Germany, 2Klinikum Regensburg, Germany

 

Objectives: The aim of this in-vitro study was to determine the fracture strength and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs).

Methods: Human molars were inserted in PMMA resin to create a three-unit (10mm) oral situation. The roots of the teeth were covered with an about 1mm thick layer of polyether to simulate the periodontium. 8 bridges of each series were made of the computer aided manufactured zirconia (Cercon Base/Cercon Ceram Kiss, DeguDent, G), an electro-layered chip-bridge-system (Inceram Alumina- Wolceram, G) and a layering Al2O3 technique (Inceram Alumina, Vita, G; - control). All FPDs were fixed with an adhesive bonding system (Syntac classic/Variolink2; Ivoclar-Vivadent, FL). After thermal cycling and mechanical loading (TCML; 6000 thermal cycles [5°C/55°C] and 1.2x106 mastication cycles [50N]) fracture strength (UTM 1446; Zwick; v=1mm/min) was determined. Failure detection was set to 10% of the maximum force. Marginal adaptation was evaluated at both transitions cement-tooth (CT) and cement-FPD (CF) using scanning electron microscopy (Stereoscan 240, Cambridge Instr., GB) before and after TCML. The criteria "perfect margin" was ranked as a smooth transition without interruptions of continuity. Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U-test (p=0.05).

Results:

Median (25%/75%)

Cercon

Wolceram

Inceram (control)

Fracture force [N]

1331 (1224/1428)

575 (487/735)

334 (315/673)

Marginal adaptation [%]

 

 

 

CT :    before -

           after TCML

95.5 (91.5/99.0) -

98.0 (95.5/98.8)

98.7 (96.8/99.3) -

98.6 (96.8/99.6)

91.3 (83.9/93.3) -

86.9 (76.0/96.9)

CF :    before -

           after TCML

97.0 (90.3/100.0)

94.5 (87.8/98.0)

98.4 (93.9/99.4) -

97.9 (95.2/99.2)

90.1 (86.3/92.3) -

75.9 (69.1/89.8)

Zirconia CAM FPDs showed statistically significant higher fracture resistance than Al2O3 FPDs or electro-layered FPDs. Only the reference showed significant lower marginal adaptation.

Conclusion: Electro-layered Al2O3 FPDs may only be used with restriction in posterior areas. The fracture forces of zirconia FPDs were at a level where clinical application seems promising.

 

 

 


 

Seq #214 - Ceramic Crowns, Core, Zirconia, Stress, Fracture
2:00 PM-3:00 PM, Saturday, 11 March 2006 Dolphin Hotel Pacific Hall

Back to the Dental Materials: III - Ceramics and Cements Program
Back to the ADEA/AADR/CADR Meeting & Exhibition (March 8-11, 2006)

Top Level Search