2084 Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Cements to CAD/CAM Porcelain Substrates
J. DUNN1, H. LU1, A. WILSON1, and X. QIAN2, 1Loma Linda University, CA, USA, 2KERR Corporation, Orange, CA, USA

Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Cements to CAD/CAM Porcelain Substrates Objective: to test and compare shear bond strengths (SBS) of two self-adhesive resin cements (Maxcem/Kerr and Unicem/3M ESPE), along with a RMGI cement (FujiCem/GC America) to two CEREC CAD/CAM porcelain substrates (Vitablocs Mark II/Vita Zahnfabrik and ProCad/Ivoclar) subjected to two different surface treatments.  Methods: All substrates were polished with 600 grit SiC paper and then further subjected to two different surface treatments: (I) recommended treatment (control): 9.5% HF (Gresco Products Inc.) etching + Silane primer (Kerr); and (II) modified treatment: Air-abrasion (AA) with 50” Al2O3 + 9.5% HF etching.  Bonding was conducted with an Ultradent jig having a cylindrical mold (D=2.38mm) into which each cement was extruded and allowed to self-cure.  The bonded specimens (n=8 per group) were stored in de-ionized water (37șC) for 24 hours before debonding on an Instron mechanical tester using shear force.   Results:

 

Shear Bond Strength, MPa

CEREC Porcelain Substrates

Surface Treatments

Self-Adhesive Cements

FujiCem

Maxcem

Unicem

VitaBlocs

I (HF + Silane)

9.8±4.4b

25.0±2.2a

19.6±4.0a

II (AA + HF)

10.1±3.2b

22.2±6.0a

21.0±3.2a

ProCAD

I (HF + Silane)

7.5±2.0D

17.8±2.9A,B

15.9±3.6B,C

II (AA + HF)

12.7±2.2C

22.4±4.2A

20.3±2.9A,B

*Means with the same letter for each substrate are not statistically different from each other at p = 0.05. Analysis: ANOVA analysis revealed that both Maxcem and Unicem had significantly higher (p<0.05) SBS's than FujiCem for all substrate/treatment combinations.  The SBS's of Maxcem and Unicem are not statistically (p=0.05) different from each other for all substrate/treatment combinations.  For both substrates, there are no statistical differences (p=0.05) in SBS between two different surface treatments for each cement with the exception of FujiCem/ProCAD combination.  Conclusion: the order of bond strengths to all substrate/treatment combinations is Maxcem followed by Unicem and FujiCem.  Both surface treatments yields comparable SBS's for each substrate for the two self-adhesive resin cements studied.

Seq #171 - Cements: Bond Strength
3:30 PM-4:30 PM, Friday, 30 June 2006 Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre Exhibit Hall 1

Back to the Dental Materials: III - Ceramics and Cements Program
Back to the IADR General Session & Exhibition (June 28 – July 1, 2006)

Top Level Search