3258 Micro-Tensile Bond Strengths of Tooth-Denture Interfaces
A. ALSIYABI, S.C. BAYNE, A.D. GUCKES, and D. FELTON, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA

Introduction: Debonding of denture teeth from denture bases continues as a problem for wear-resistant denture teeth.  ISO testing methods for tooth-denture assemblies create complex loads, variability in results, and test “toughness” more than tooth-denture “interfacial strengths.”  Objective:  Utilize a micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) testing to evaluate interfacial bonding of PMMA versus IPN teeth in heat-cured PMMA versus light-cured UDMA denture bases.  Methods:  1-tooth dentures (central incisor, Lucitone-199 denture-base resin, heat-cure, 5 assemblies per flask) were processed with representative combinations of (a) different teeth (PMMA, IPN), (b) surface treatments (none, sandblasting=SB, bur roughening [BR], MMA pretreatment, denture tooth-bonding systems [TBS]), and (c) representative denture-base materials (PMMA, Eclipse UDMA Prosthodontic Resin [Dentsply]).  10 µTBS bars per group (~1x1x30mm) were sectioned from 1-tooth dentures parallel to the tooth long axis and ~90° to the tooth-denture interface and stored (>72h, dry, 25°C) before µTBS testing (E-Z Tester, CHS=0.1mm/min).  Denture bases alone were tested for reference.  Differences (ANOVA, p£0.05, Tukey's post-hoc tests, no shared superscripts) among group means (±sd, MPa) are reported below.  Adhesive-cohesive failure patterns were noted.

 Teeth:

---

PMMA

PMMA

PMMA

IPN

IPN

IPN

---

Denture:

PMMA

PMMA

PMMA

PMMA

PMMA

PMMA

UDMA

UDMA

Mech. Tx

---

No

SB

No

No

SB

BR

---

Chem. Tx

---

No

No

MMA

No

No

TBS

---

µTBS (MPa)

46±14ad

45±17ab

66±6bc

69±20ab

57±8ab

73±15bc

50±17ab

59±3ad

Results:  µTBS values were comparable in magnitude to values for dentin bonding systems (~60 MPa).  Results had relatively small sd's making the µTBS approach attractive.  Failures were predominantly interfacial (>55%).  SB or MMA treatments improved µTBS for PMMA, as expected.  UDMA denture-base material was stronger, but with IPN teeth did not produce the highest µTBS values.  Conclusion:  µTBS allowed more careful analysis of tooth-denture interfaces.  Roughened surfaces produced the greatest µTBS values.  Acknowledgment: Supported by Trubyte-Dentsply.

Seq #344 - Prosthodontic Polymers
10:15 AM-11:30 AM, Saturday, 13 March 2004 Hawaii Convention Center Exhibit Hall 1-2

Back to the Dental Materials: VI - Polymer Materials-Mechanical Properties and Degradation Program
Back to the IADR/AADR/CADR 82nd General Session (March 10-13, 2004)

Top Level Search