| 3258 Micro-Tensile Bond Strengths of Tooth-Denture Interfaces | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A. ALSIYABI, S.C. BAYNE, A.D. GUCKES, and D. FELTON, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA Introduction: Debonding of denture teeth from denture bases continues as a problem for wear-resistant denture teeth. ISO testing methods for tooth-denture assemblies create complex loads, variability in results, and test “toughness” more than tooth-denture “interfacial strengths.” Objective: Utilize a micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) testing to evaluate interfacial bonding of PMMA versus IPN teeth in heat-cured PMMA versus light-cured UDMA denture bases. Methods: 1-tooth dentures (central incisor, Lucitone-199 denture-base resin, heat-cure, 5 assemblies per flask) were processed with representative combinations of (a) different teeth (PMMA, IPN), (b) surface treatments (none, sandblasting=SB, bur roughening [BR], MMA pretreatment, denture tooth-bonding systems [TBS]), and (c) representative denture-base materials (PMMA, Eclipse UDMA Prosthodontic Resin [Dentsply]). 10 µTBS bars per group (~1x1x30mm) were sectioned from 1-tooth dentures parallel to the tooth long axis and ~90° to the tooth-denture interface and stored (>72h, dry, 25°C) before µTBS testing (E-Z Tester, CHS=0.1mm/min). Denture bases alone were tested for reference. Differences (ANOVA, p£0.05, Tukey's post-hoc tests, no shared superscripts) among group means (±sd, MPa) are reported below. Adhesive-cohesive failure patterns were noted.
Results: µTBS values were comparable in magnitude to values for dentin bonding systems (~60 MPa). Results had relatively small sd's making the µTBS approach attractive. Failures were predominantly interfacial (>55%). SB or MMA treatments improved µTBS for PMMA, as expected. UDMA denture-base material was stronger, but with IPN teeth did not produce the highest µTBS values. Conclusion: µTBS allowed more careful analysis of tooth-denture interfaces. Roughened surfaces produced the greatest µTBS values. Acknowledgment: Supported by Trubyte-Dentsply. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Seq #344 - Prosthodontic Polymers 10:15 AM-11:30 AM, Saturday, 13 March 2004 Hawaii Convention Center Exhibit Hall 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Back to the Dental Materials: VI - Polymer Materials-Mechanical Properties and Degradation Program
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||