3116 Evaluation of microleakage and enamel bond strength of adhesive systems
M.S. MIRANDA1, T. RABELLO2, K. DIAS1, and C.M. GARCIA2, 1UERJ, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Objectives: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate microleakage and enamel shear bond strength of five dentin adhesive systems. Methods: For microleakege testing, Class V cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of thirty human pre-molars, with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin/cementum. These preparations were restored with compomer (Dyract AP) following application of: Group1–37% phosphoric acid + Prime & Bond NT(control); Group2–Non-Rinse Conditioner + Prime & Bond NT; Group3–Prime & Bond NT(no etching); Group4–Clearfil SE Bond; and Group5–Adper Prompt L-Pop. After 24h storage at 37ºC in water, margins were finished with polishing discs and the surrounding tooth surfaces coated with nail varnish. The samples were immersed in a 50% solution of silver nitrate for 24h and a RX developing solution for 8h. The samples were cut, polished and the extent of microleakage was measured and ranked using a 0-3 scale. For enamel shear bond strength testing, fifty human molars were embedded in epoxy resin and ground flat to 600-800grit. The enamel surfaces were treated according to the five groups described above, and then compomer cylinders were built on the enamel surfaces. After 1 week in water at 37ºC, shear bond strengths were measured in EMIC machine at 0.5mm/min. Results: On the microleakage test, the mean ranks were: Gr.1=103.45; Gr.2=138.39; Gr.3=186.34; Gr.4=98.76; Gr.5=138.34. Kruskal Whalis test revealed significant difference among the groups. The mean shear bond strength values MPa±SD were: Gr.1=23.39±3.99; Gr.2=18.11±3.64; Gr.3=10.88±2.47; Gr.4=22.69±3.87; Gr.5=17.62±3.94. ANOVA revealed significant difference among the groups and Student Newman Keuls test (p<0.05) showed the statistical differences. Conclusions: The authors concluded that the Group 4 was similar to the control group and the Group 2, 3 and 5 presented results that were inferior to the control group, in both tests. Supported by FAPERJ-E-26/172.310/2000-APQ1

Seq #335 - Adhesion III
10:15 AM-11:30 AM, Saturday, 13 March 2004 Hawaii Convention Center Exhibit Hall 1-2

Back to the Dental Materials: I - Adhesion-Composite Bond Strength Program
Back to the IADR/AADR/CADR 82nd General Session (March 10-13, 2004)

Top Level Search