| | |
| 1465 | Five-year Clinical Performance of Posterior Composite Resin Restorations Placed by Dental Students
N.J.M. OPDAM, B.A.C. LOOMANS, F.J.M. ROETERS, and E.M. BRONKHORST, University of Nijmegen, Netherlands |
| 1466 | Three-year Clinical Evaluation of Filtek P-60 Packable Composite Restorations
A. KIREMITCI, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey |
| 1467 | Clinical Evaluation of a New Direct Composite Resin System: Two-year Results
M.F.L. NAVARRO1, M. BALKENHOL2, R.F.L. MONDELLI1, A. ISHIKIRIAMA1, M.F.F. JORGE1, E. BRESCIANI1, T.D.J.E. BARATA1, D.F.G. CEFALY1, and J.R.P. LAURIS1, 1 Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Brazil, 2 Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany |
| 1468 | Clinical Evaluation of Large Posterior Composite Restorations Bonded with a New Self-Etching Adhesive System: 6-month Results
A. PESCHKE, S.D. HEINTZE, and V. RHEINBERGER, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein |
| 1469 | Clinical Performance of Prodigy Condensable Restorations after Two Years
C.-P. ERNST, K. AKSOGAN, K. CANBEK, and B. WILLERSHAUSEN, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany |
| 1470 | Clinical Performance of Amalgam and Composite Restorations
F. KORAY1, O.A. ADEBAYO1, E. YÝLDÝZ1, H. SANCAKLÝ1, and N. TURAN2, 1 Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Turkey, 2 Istanbul University, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. of Biostatistic, Turkey |
| 1471 | Meta-analysis of the Reasons for the Replacement of Failed Restorations Over the Past 5 Years
T.W. SMYTH1, P.E. MURRAY2, and F. GARCIA-GODOY2, 1 Private practice, Glencoe, MN, USA, 2 Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA |
| 1472 | One-year Clinical Trial of Gradia Direct Class II Restorations
A. FABIANELLI, S. GRANDINI, C. GORACCI, and M. FERRARI, University of Siena, Livorno, Italy |
| 1473 | WITHDRAWN
| | 1474 | Clinical Performance of Surefil Packable Composite Restorations after Three Years
Y. KORKMAZ, and A. KIREMITCI, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey |
| 1475 | Flitek Supreme Composite Resin, 6-month Clinical Evaluation
J.R. DUNN1, C.A. MUNOZ2, A. WILSON1, and R.C. RANDALL3, 1 Loma Linda University, CA, USA, 2 Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, CA, USA, 3 3M ESPE Dental Products, St Paul, MN, USA |
| 1476 | Influence of Explorer Tip Diameter in Identifying Restoration Margin Discrepancies
M. HAYASHI1, N.H.F. WILSON2, S. EBISU1, and D.C. WATTS3, 1 Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Suita, Japan, 2 Kings College London, University of London, United Kingdom, 3 University of Manchester Dental School, United Kingdom |
| 1477 | Marginal Quality of Class-V Resin Composite Restorations with and without Softstart Polymerization
M. ROSIN, University of Greifswald, Germany, A. MEHL, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany, J. KROHN, Private Practice, Seebad Ahlbeck, Germany, and R. HICKEL, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany |
| 1478 | Lab-made and Direct Composite Restorations: A Retrospective, Clinical Study after 5-8 Years
M.A. KRÄHENMANN1, T.N. GÖHRING2, and T. IMFELD2, 1 University of Bern, Switzerland, 2 University of Zurich, Switzerland |
| 1479 | Four-year Clinical Evaluation of a Universal Composite Resin System
V.V. GORDAN, R. WATSON, C. SHEN, and I.A. MJOR, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA |
| 1480 | Clinical Evaluation of Class II Composite Restorations -- 30-month Results
F. SCHÄFERS, Private Dental Office, Hattorf, Germany, and C. KRANTZ-SCHÄFERS, University of Goettingen, Germany |
|